Geocaching in Central New York
July 30, 2010, 21:04:59 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Click here to join us on Facebook!
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Geocaching in Central New York > Geocaching > General Geocaching Discussion > Ask the Reviewer
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: Ask the Reviewer  (Read 481 times)
Novac
DNF King
Administrator
Crazy Cacher
******
Posts: 366



WWW
« on: June 12, 2009, 19:49:22 »
In Syracuse and parts west, we have wonderful reviewer Sapience Trek. ST is willing to answer questions you might have.

Do you have a question about the cache review process, or guidelines that geocaching.com follows? You can always email Sapience Trek directly, but if you think a public discussion might be worthwhile feel free to post it here and ST will try to check in every so often.

Dislaimer: Remember that Sapience Trek only speaks as a volunteer for geocaching.com and not the other listing sites.

Thanks in advance to Sapience Trek. All your time volunteering is much appreciated!
Logged
Novac
DNF King
Administrator
Crazy Cacher
******
Posts: 366



WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2009, 19:55:43 »
OK, here are a few questions I have...

The DEC just posted a revised set of guidelines for their managed land, and it specifically discusses geocaching as an allowed practice. This is good news for caches in the Camillus unique area, but does this have any impact at all on the WMAs? Or is that not even in the DEC's area?

If there's a questionable cache and the guidelines aren't clear, what do you do? Do you just decide on your own, or do you ask Groundspeak or other reviewers? Is there a place where the various reviewers discuss different things together, or are you generally autonomous?
Logged
ScouterDuck
Power Cacher
***
Posts: 26


The ScouterDuck, Mergina Explorator


WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2009, 07:50:29 »
I'm likewise wondering about WMAs.  I had a pair in the Lakeview WMA, and they were approved and stood for a year and a half.  When I later went to put one in Dexter Marsh, it was rejected.  Having just learned of the rules, I removed the one in Dexter Marsh and also pulled the two at Lakeview.

However, there are TONS of older caches still on WMAs.  It seems the rule was not applied retro-actively, and not all hiders took voluntary action as I did.  What will happen now?

As said before, thanks for taking the time on this forum.
Logged
On my honor, I will do my best...
sapiencetrek
Newbie
*
Posts: 6
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2009, 16:04:19 »
Quote from: Novac on June 12, 2009, 19:55:43
The DEC just posted a revised set of guidelines for their managed land, and it specifically discusses geocaching as an allowed practice. This is good news for caches in the Camillus unique area, but does this have any impact at all on the WMAs? Or is that not even in the DEC's area?

I am no expert in how the DEC manages their different properties.  I do know that the WMA has different people overseeing the lands than that of state forests.   We have for years published caches on DEC lands with the exception of WMA.  As far as I know right now, that hasn't changed.   I am trying to find this out, as I would love to see the WMA lands opened up.

Quote
If there's a questionable cache and the guidelines aren't clear, what do you do? Do you just decide on your own, or do you ask Groundspeak or other reviewers? Is there a place where the various reviewers discuss different things together, or are you generally autonomous?

There are reviewer forums where we can bring caches to in order to get other opinions and/or guidance from Groundspeak.
Logged
sapiencetrek
Newbie
*
Posts: 6
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2009, 16:07:14 »
Quote from: ScouterDuck on June 13, 2009, 07:50:29
I'm likewise wondering about WMAs.  I had a pair in the Lakeview WMA, and they were approved and stood for a year and a half.  When I later went to put one in Dexter Marsh, it was rejected.  Having just learned of the rules, I removed the one in Dexter Marsh and also pulled the two at Lakeview.

However, there are TONS of older caches still on WMAs.  It seems the rule was not applied retro-actively, and not all hiders took voluntary action as I did.  What will happen now?

As said before, thanks for taking the time on this forum.

Years ago, caches were not allowed on any DEC lands.  When reviewing I see a number of caches that were submitted and never listed in state forests because the DEC did not want us listing there (this was prior to my time as a reviewer, so I don't have first hand experience.)   At some point after that, they allowed for geocaches in DEC lands except for WMA.   We did not go back and archive existing caches, as the DEC did not require us to do so. 
Logged
Novac
DNF King
Administrator
Crazy Cacher
******
Posts: 366



WWW
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2009, 09:50:02 »
I have a question about proximity rules. If I am placing a puzzle/mystery cache, can I place the marker near an existing cache? My physical cache will be a ways away, but I wanted the "marker" to be in a specific location that is relative to the puzzle. Recently, a physical cache was placed very close to this spot. Am I still able to put my "false" coords nearby?
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!