Geocaching in Central New York
July 30, 2010, 21:00:02 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Found a bug or problem? Let us know!
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Poll
Question: Should "Nano" get its own official cache size (instead of being listed under micro)?
Yes - 7 (70%)
No - 1 (10%)
Don't care - 2 (20%)
Undecided - 0 (0%)
Total Voters: 10

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Nano cache sizes  (Read 412 times)
Novac
DNF King
Administrator
Crazy Cacher
******
Posts: 366



WWW
« on: May 12, 2009, 09:50:18 »

What are your thoughts on "Nano" having its own size to separate it from "Micro"?

Do you think Micro should continue to cover anything "key holder"-sized and smaller? Or would you prefer to know when you're looking for something trickier than that?
Logged

Sabrefan7
Geocacher
**
Posts: 20



« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2009, 20:34:36 »

I call a "nano"  something that holds a log to small for me to sign Grin I think they should be different from a micro
Logged

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!